--
 

Centre de Recherche et d'Etudes pour l'Art Préhistorique Emile Cartailhac

   

 

EXPERIMENTATION :
FROM GESTURE TO ANALYSIS


     Experimentation is one of the means that researchers use to study archaeological material when faced with the numerous questions arising from observation. It is an analytical method that passes through various phases of observation, a constant give-and-take between the study of the actual archaeological material and the data obtained from experimentation.

     Experimentation was used to study Palaeolithic Art very soon after its discovery, with the aim of authenticating it: L. Legay between 1875 and 1880 was the first to set up an experimental procedure in order to establish a connexion between flint tools and markings found on an archaeological object. However, this development was also made in connexion with the technological studies undertaken with regards to bone objects. Experimentation is indeed part of three important directions given to archaeological studies, namely:

     – the link between experimentation and the comparison to archaeological artefacts
     – reading and characterisation of stigmata techniques (in order to create a model by default)
     – integration of known and recognised techniques in, firstly, a general operating framework and secondly, a chronological and cultural framework.

     Within an artistic framework, experimentation allows us to answer specific questions concerning the reconstitution of technical processes: transforming a medium, operating gestures, direction of line drawings, etc... We are therefore concerned with recreating these gestures in order to analyse them and obtain a reference of stigmatas that we can then compare (with the help of macro and microscopic observations) to the archaeological material in question (see the PhD thesis by Lise Aurière).


Methodological Framework (C. Fritz, La gravure dans l'art mobilier magdalénien, DAF n°75, 1999, fig. 1)

Examples of observations of archaeological stigmatas using a double-lens magnifying glass

Markings forming a pattern on a reindeer antler

 

Engraved patterns and traces of shaping on the distal end of a projectile point in reindeer antler

 

Longitudinal scratching of the surface


Examples of observations of archaeological stigmatas using Scanning Electron Microscopy

Montage of micrographs (Arancou ; C. Fritz - La gravure dans l'art mobilier magdalénien , DAF n° 75, 1999, fig. 34)

Comparison of archaeological and experimental stigmatas

 

Parallel transversal incisions.

 

Parallel transversal incisions on a fresh bone.

Reproduction of technical gestures

 

Grooves for the making of a raw object

 

Rasping of the surface

Reproduction of the operating chain for the manufacture of an object
(example of an ivory circle of Sungir type)

   

Two steps of the chaîne opératoire (operating chain).

 

Experimental perforated bone discs.

 

Archaeological bone discs.

-

-- CREAP

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-- Home
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-- Participants
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-- Research themes
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-- Database
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-- Bibliography
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-- Collaborations
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-- News
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-- Field works
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .